BD publish-quality-gate
发布质量门禁：发布任何 Skill/专家包/文档/工具到外部（分享、上架市场、对外发布）前后的质量检查。发布前执行四层敏感信息检查（公司信息→本机信息→个人信息→机密信息），发布后按 TRACE 五维（Trust/Reliability/Adaptability/Convention/Effectiveness）执行 AI 自测。当用户说'准备发布'、'发布前检查'、'发布后自测'、'TRACE 评测'、'检查一下发布物'、'脱敏检查'、'发布质量'时使用。
发布质量门禁：发布任何 Skill/专家包/文档/工具到外部（分享、上架市场、对外发布）前后的质量检查。发布前执行四层敏感信息检查（公司信息→本机信息→个人信息→机密信息），发布后按 TRACE…
As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 231 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
description-no-whenneither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "title" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "copyright" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 564 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 231: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.