SKILLEMALL.ai

AC nutrient-openclaw

OpenClaw-native PDF/document processing skill for Nutrient DWS. Best for OpenClaw users who need PDF conversion, OCR, text/table extraction, PII redaction, watermarking, digital signatures, and API credit checks via built-in `nutrient_*` tools. Triggers on OpenClaw tool names (`nutrient_convert_to_pdf`, `nutrient_extract_text`, etc.), "OpenClaw plugin", "Nutrient OpenClaw", and document-processing requests in OpenClaw chats. Files are processed by Nutrient DWS over the network, so use it only when third-party document processing is acceptable. For non-OpenClaw environments, use the Universal Nutrient Document Processing skill instead.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zhouhuihui008 v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 627 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "clawdis"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (nutrient-openclaw) differs from the folder (nutrient-openclaw-1-2-5)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 7 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 627 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 642: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a disclosed document-processing integration that sends selected files to Nutrient’s service, with no evidence of hidden or unrelated behavior in the skill artifacts.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026