SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB linkmind-interaction

Operate LinkMind Interaction menu features against the hosted LinkMind server with API-key identity: recommended/joined/owned channels, subscribe/unsubscribe, monitor/list/send messages, create/enable/disable/delete/translate channels. Use when the user asks to manage LinkMind interaction/social channels without installing the LinkMind client.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zhujunxian3 v0.1.1 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 130 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 22 h ago

Operate LinkMind Interaction menu features against the hosted LinkMind server with API-key identity: recommended/joined/owned channels, subscribe/unsubscribe…

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 85Steps. 6 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1130 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 345: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is purpose-aligned for managing LinkMind channels, but it needs review because it can use ambient API keys and perform account-changing actions including posts and channel deletion.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 3 Jun 2026