BC evolving-agent
自我进化Agent - 基于进化论的混合进化策略，结合达尔文式探索与拉马克式优化，支持种群进化、精英保留、交叉重组。Self-evolving agent with hybrid evolutionary strategy: Darwinian exploration + Lamarckian optimization, population evolution, elitism, and crossover. 自我进化、进化论、种群进化、精英保留、交叉重组、达尔文进化、拉马克进化、发散推理、收敛验证、适应度评分、基因库、skill结晶、进化策略、agent进化、智能体进化、自主进化、持续进化、三环架构、模块化能力、竞技场、evolutionary agent、Darwinian evolution、Lamarckian evolution、population-based evolution、elitism、crossover、self-evolution、continuous improvement、three-ring architecture、modular capabilities、arena competition。
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: 自我进化Agent - 基于进化论的混合进化策略，结合达尔文式探索与拉马克式优化，支持种群进化、精英保留、交叉重组。Self-evo… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (evolving-agent) differs from the folder (auto-evolving-agent)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4808 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 210 steps
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 522: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 54 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 210 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.