SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC mcp-third-party-publisher

Use when publishing or submitting an MCP server to third-party MCP directories and marketplaces including Glama, mcp.so, Smithery, and MCP Market, especially when Codex must use Computer Use, Browser, or Chrome to open websites, fill submission forms, verify listing pages, and stop before final external submission.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 梓安 v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 882 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

so, Smithery, and MCP Market, especially when Codex must use Computer Use, Browser, or Chrome to open websites, fill submission forms, verify listing pages…

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

AnalyzerGitHubGmailAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 120 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1882 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 316: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 120 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill appears intended to automate third-party MCP marketplace submissions, but the reported defaults could publish under an unapproved email and select a paid listing without clear user opt-in.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 Jun 2026