BB semantic-scholar-library-feed
Work with a user's Semantic Scholar account to read Research Feeds, inspect private Library folders, add papers to folders, and resolve Semantic Scholar paper records from identifiers such as arXiv IDs.
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 963 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 202: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is not deceptive, but it asks for reusable Semantic Scholar session cookies, stores them in plaintext, and can export or change private library data.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026