BF hegui-consult
上市公司合规、任职资格、公司治理及信息披露咨询。用户询问某事项是否合法合规、是否需要公告、是否影响董事、独立董事或高级管理人员任职资格，或涉及减持、回购、关联交易、担保、重组、分红、股权激励、停复牌、内幕信息、业绩预告、退市风险、权益变动、再融资、募集资金、问询回复及三会治理时使用。先调用 hegui MCP 查询并核验法规数据库中的现行正文；法规结构化结论仅用于内部路由，只有法规支持披露义务时才检索公告数据库中的同类案例。查完法规后根据返回 JSON 内容判断是否需要公告格式（条款指向格式或事项需出具公告时），补取对应板块的现行公告格式文件及可下载模板附件。最终答复必须提供正式法规名称、文号、状态、条款原文和适用分析，附适用的公告格式模板，并附通过验证的公告案例及数据库记录对应的公告原文件。禁止独立联网搜索或使用模型记忆补充法规和公告。
上市公司合规、任职资格、公司治理及信息披露咨询。用户询问某事项是否合法合规、是否需要公告、是否影响董事、独立董事或高级管理人员任职资格，或涉及减持、回购、关联交易、担保、重组、分红、股权激励、停复牌、内幕信息、业绩预告、退市风险、权益变动、再融资、募集资金、问询回复及三会治理时使用。先调用 hegui MCP…
As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/retrieval-strategy.md, references/clarification-policy.md, references/citation-standard.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/retrieval-strategy.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/clarification-policy.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/citation-standard.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/full-text-verification.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/routing-contract.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/format-retrieval.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/announcement-retrieval.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/answer-contract.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/evaluation-cases.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100
- 0Tools and files. 9 referenced file(s) missing: references/retrieval-strategy.md, references/clarification-policy.md, references/citation-standard.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (hegui-consult) differs from the folder (hegui)
- 100Steps. 62 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2265 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 374: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 62 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.