CF vpcs-paper-check
当用户询问或操作维普查重大学生版、维普查重研究生版、维普查重编辑部版、维普查重职称版、维普查重作业版、维普查重科研版、维普AIGC检测、维普格式检测、维普斟知智评三版本、参考文献质量/斟校对/数据图像可信度专项检测，以及订单提交、支付交接、报告下载或官方验真时使用。该 Skill 提供 15 个 SKU 的本地产品快照、按需实时价格刷新、FAQ 口径、/pwp 上传接口和订单查询脚本；不代替用户支付、不绕过验证码，也不把维普自查结果承诺为学校终检结果。
当用户询问或操作维普查重大学生版、维普查重研究生版、维普查重编辑部版、维普查重职称版、维普查重作业版、维普查重科研版、维普AIGC检测、维普格式检测、维普斟知智评三版本、参考文献质量/斟校对/数据图像可信度专项检测，以及订单提交、支付交接、报告下载或官方验真时使用。该 Skill 提供 15 个 SKU…
As a process F 31/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: assets/report-guides/, assets/report-guides/01-word-character-count.jpg, assets/report-guides/02-vpcs-report-number.jpg
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 31. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 6171 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/report-guides/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/report-guides/01-word-character-count.jpg - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/report-guides/02-vpcs-report-number.jpg - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/report-guides/03-report-download-archive.jpg - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/report-guides/04-report-authenticity.jpg - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/report-guides/05-aigc-report-authenticity.jpg - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/report-guides/06-verify-report-code.jpg
Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: assets/report-guides/, assets/report-guides/01-word-character-count.jpg, assets/report-guides/02-vpcs-report-number.jpg
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6171 tokens
- 100Steps. 235 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 228: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 69 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 235 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.