BC openclaw
提供结构化的服务器运维工作流程，包含系统识别、安全检查、命令验证和故障排查；当用户需要系统管理、性能优化、日志分析或服务器维护时使用
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-disable-securityreferences/safety-checklist.md:83Disables a security control (Defender, Gatekeeper, SIP, firewall, execution policy) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `iptables -F` - 清空防火墙规则
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processreferences/linux-commands.md:129Starts a background / autostarted processsystemctl enable service_name # 开机自启
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/safety-checklist.md:84Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `chmod 777` - 设置权限为完全开放
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionreferences/safety-checklist.md:93Mentions editing / listing crontab (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `crontab -e` - 编辑定时任务
quoted
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (openclaw) differs from the folder (sre-operator)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 129 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1120 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 66: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 33 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 129 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.