SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC baidu-netdisk-skills

百度网盘(Baidu Drive, pan.baidu.com)文件管理 — 上传、下载、转存、分享、搜索、移动、复制、重命名、创建文件夹、删除（高风险，需用户确认）。 同时支持 Agent 记忆备份/恢复（kimiclaw/maxclaw/qclaw/openclaw）。 TRIGGER: 用户消息明确提及"百度网盘 / 百度云盘 / bdpan / baidu netdisk / baidu pan / baidu drive / pan.baidu.com"并涉及具体文件操作； 或用户提及"备份记忆 / 恢复记忆 / 查看记忆备份"等记忆相关操作。 DO NOT TRIGGER: 仅泛指"网盘 / 云盘 / 云存储 / 百度云"而未明确指向百度网盘时；用户在讨论其他云盘服务（OneDrive/Google Drive/阿里云盘/夸克网盘等）；本地记忆整理/清理操作；PPT 生成操作（已独立为 baidu-wenku-aippt skill）。

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings
ClawHub Agent Skills author: zuoyunlai v1.0.0 MIT-0 14 files · 6 scripts body ≈ 1 955 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGoogle DriveAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
82/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
77
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: baidu-netdisk-skills (ClawHub)

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Dangerous commands
If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

  • high Dangerous commands cmd-disable-security reference/troubleshooting.md:292
    Disables a security control (Defender, Gatekeeper, SIP, firewall, execution policy)
    xattr -d com.apple.quarantine ~/.local/bin/bdpan
Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Bash Read Glob Grep AskUserQuestion

Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 37 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1955 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 6 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 439: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
  • +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent Baidu Netdisk manager, but it has enough under-disclosed high-impact actions that users should review it carefully before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026