BC fanqie-masterclass
番茄小说短篇爆款创作完整教学课程。用于教授番茄小说平台创作方法论，包括平台算法认知、标题导语创作、脑洞生成、AI辅助工作流、去AI味润色、多平台变现、海外出海等全套技能。当用户想学习番茄小说创作、提升短篇写作能力、诊断作品问题、生成爆款标题导语大纲、去除AI味、或了解出海变现时使用。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: fanqie-masterclass (ClawHub)
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 493 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 142: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (12 of 12)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This static writing-course skill does not run code, but it needs Review because it teaches risky publishing tactics including plagiarism-style imitation, fake engagement, and specific tax-form guidance.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026