CD lunheng-article-pipeline
学术论文/深度长文/行业分析流水线：含同行评审与期刊/发布渠道匹配建议（advisory）。不调用执行类工具（exec/process/code_execution，声明式）；主控持有会话编排与状态类工具（多 Agent 派发/收报告的设计内必需面）。标准架构 = 多 Agent 九角色流水线（角色卡 11 张，含 T0 主控 + T9b 压力测试；T9b 默认不跑）；worker 不可用按节点接管并披露（详正文）。Routine 写盘（status.md / audits/）已声明；心跳为 opt-in「Operational Telemetry」。v2.14.0 起新增 G18 方法论审计（12 项清单 + D2 评分）。
学术论文/深度长文/行业分析流水线：含同行评审与期刊/发布渠道匹配建议（advisory）。不调用执行类工具（exec/process/codeexecution，声明式）；主控持有会话编排与状态类工具（多 Agent 派发/收报告的设计内必需面）。标准架构 = 多 Agent 九角色流水线（角色卡 11 张，含…
As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/permissions.md, references/agents/00-主控-扩展职责.md, references/_shared/真源/phase-order.yaml
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 78. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/permissions.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/agents/00-主控-扩展职责.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/_shared/真源/phase-order.yaml - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/dispatch/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/agents/07-审计-auditor.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/gates/14-中文AI痕迹-gate.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/checkers/中文AI痕迹-checker.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/dispatch/T9-同行评审.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/pipeline-readme.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100
- 0Tools and files. 9 referenced file(s) missing: references/permissions.md, references/agents/00-主控-扩展职责.md, references/_shared/真源/phase-order.yaml
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1714 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 317: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 55.