SKILLEMALL.ai

AD iaiops-water

Water-treatment edition of iaiops — waterworks / wastewater plants / pump stations: Modbus-TCP/RTU (dosing skids, analyzers, flow meters), OPC-UA (plant SCADA / PLC read), HART-IP process instrumentation (pH, turbidity, conductivity, level, flow transmitters), plus the cross-protocol brain (downtime root-cause, data quality watchdog, OEE). Use when the task mentions water treatment, 水处理, 水厂, 污水, pH, 浊度, turbidity, 电导率, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, 加药, dosing pump, 泵站, pump station, aeration / 曝气, or lift station. Read-first; this edition's tool surface is read-only.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: wei zhou v0.27.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 584 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 36 h ago

Water-treatment edition of iaiops — waterworks / wastewater plants / pump stations: Modbus-TCP/RTU (dosing skids, analyzers, flow meters), OPC-UA (plant SCADA…

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSecuritySoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 49): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 34 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1584 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 575: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is documentation-only and mostly coherent, but it claims to be read-only while also listing publish, export, and push tools for an industrial operations context.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · 3 Sept 2026