BD openclaw-daily-ops
Daily cost reporting + session hygiene for OpenClaw deployments. Tracks per-session API spend, shows 7-day trend, and wipes zombie sessions >24h old to prevent context snowball. Zero personal info — configure with your own paths and Discord channel. Runs nightly via cron.
As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlconfig.example.json:4Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (placeholder value)"discord_webhook": "https://discord.com/api/webhooks/YOUR_WEBHOOK_ID/YOUR_WEBHOOK_TOKEN",
placeholder -
low Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlSKILL.md:35Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)"discord_webhook": "https://discord.com/api/webhooks/YOUR/WEBHOOK",
vendor-hostquoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionSKILL.md:79Mentions editing / listing crontab# Add to crontab -e
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1267 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 272: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.