SKILLEMALL.ai

AC sagemaker-training-job

Submit ML training jobs to AWS SageMaker — package code, upload to S3, launch on GPU/CPU instances, poll status, download artifacts. Use when training machine learning models that need more compute than the local machine (GPU training, large datasets, parallel experiments). Supports PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, XGBoost/LightGBM. Handles spot instances for cost savings. Triggers on "train on SageMaker", "GPU training", "submit training job", "cloud training", "SageMaker", "remote training".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zyyhhxx v1.0.2 MIT-0 9 files · 5 scripts body ≈ 1 146 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Submit ML training jobs to AWS SageMaker — package code, upload to S3, launch on GPU/CPU instances, poll status, download artifacts.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, progress reporting

ProcedureAWSSoftware developmentInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 19 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1146 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -31 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 500: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This SageMaker training skill is mostly purpose-aligned, but it has unsafe artifact download/extraction behavior and broad source packaging that could overwrite local files or upload unintended private files.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026