AC cc-remote
Claude Code 远程执行 Skill — 通过三通道(FastAPI/Redis/Screen)向远程机器上的 Claude Code 派发指令,支持重试机制。触发:博士让我"派发给 Claude Code"、"远程执行"、"让XX机器执行Claude Code"、remote cc。
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
ReferenceSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcscripts/deploy_ssh.py:148Writes to a shell startup file (detector / deny-list definition; string literal in code, not executed)echo 'alias m1="ssh m1"' >> ~/.zshrc
detectorcode literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionscripts/deploy_ssh.py:154Mentions editing / listing crontab (detector / deny-list definition; string literal in code, not executed)echo "定时清理可后续添加 (crontab -e)"
detectorcode literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processSKILL.md:38Starts a background / autostarted processnohup python3 cc_worker.py > worker.log 2>&1 &
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processSKILL.md:41Starts a background / autostarted processnohup python3 cc_api.py > api.log 2>&1 &
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 589 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 147: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill really is a remote Claude Code executor, but it exposes broad remote execution paths that need careful review before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026