SKILLEMALL.ai

BD pmstudio-arb

Generate an Architecture Review Board (ARB) presentation in a standard 11-slide format. Use when someone asks to "create an ARB deck", "architecture review presentation", "prepare for architecture review board", "ARB slides", or needs to present a product/platform architecture for sign-off. Reads PRD, architecture maps, and project memory to pre-fill technical content. Produces a self-contained HTML slide deck.

coco-research/coco Agent Skills author: coco-research 2 files body ≈ 1 132 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 7 h ago

Generate an Architecture Review Board (ARB) presentation in a standard 11-slide format.

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerOperations and projectsAI and agentsMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "domain"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pmstudio-arb) differs from the folder (arb-review)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (write) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1132 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 414: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.