SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC pmstudio-dr

Generate a Disaster Recovery plan with RTO/RPO targets. Use when someone asks to "create a DR plan", "disaster recovery", "business continuity", or "RTO RPO". Do NOT use for step-by-step restoration runbooks — use /pmstudio-recovery instead. Designed for SaaS platform products where Coco Inc is the customer — focuses on service continuity, data recovery, and vendor dependency management rather than infrastructure rebuild.

coco-research/coco Agent Skills author: coco-research 2 files body ≈ 1 475 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Generate a Disaster Recovery plan with RTO/RPO targets.

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "domain"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pmstudio-dr) differs from the folder (dr-plan)
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 85Steps. 62 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1475 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 425: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 62 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.