SKILLEMALL.ai

CF senpi-qa

QA the omo Senpi adapter (packages/omo-senpi, packages/senpi-task) against the REAL senpi binary in strict isolation, and write every artifact to the one canonical evidence path .omo/evidence/omo-senpi-adapter/<slug>/. The live drivers under packages/omo-senpi/scripts/qa/ create their own isolated SENPI_CODING_AGENT_DIR and ignore the caller's, so the real ~/.senpi/agent is never written. Ships scripts/resolve-evidence-dir.mjs, which is the ONLY sanctioned way to pick an evidence directory: it rejects traversal, separators, absolute paths, and stray roots such as local-ignore/qa-evidence. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-senpi or packages/senpi-task, or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Senpi adapter, the task/team engine, the DAG, task RPC, or skill delivery. Triggers: senpi qa, qa senpi, senpi-qa, test senpi adapter, verify senpi task, senpi task e2e, senpi team e2e, task dag qa, live senpi driver, senpi evidence path.

code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent Agent Skills author: code-yeongyu NOASSERTION 3 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 1 012 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 4 h ago

QA the omo Senpi adapter (packages/omo-senpi, packages/senpi-task) against the REAL senpi binary in strict isolation, and write every artifact to the one…

As a process F 39/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../../AGENTS.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmentAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
39/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../../../AGENTS.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../../AGENTS.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../../AGENTS.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../AGENTS.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 4 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1012 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 970: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.