CC confluent-skill-reviewer
Review a Confluent agent skill in this repo against the Agent Skills spec (agentskills.io), Confluent conventions in CLAUDE.md, the PR template gates, and the evals-as-contract rule. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review, audit, validate, or lint a skill; opens or inspects a PR that adds or modifies anything under `skills/`; asks about spec conformance, lazy-loading, frontmatter shape, trigger overlap, or eval coverage; or wants a pre-merge sanity check on skill changes. Do NOT trigger for general code review of application code; security review; auditing schemas, producer/consumer configs, PII tagging, or Terraform generation for Schema Registry (handled by `kafka-schema-registry`); runtime/log analysis of skill behavior (use `tools/skill_review_dashboard.py`); or any changes that don't touch the `skills/` tree.
Review a Confluent agent skill in this repo against the Agent Skills spec (agentskills.io), Confluent conventions in CLAUDE.md, the PR template gates, and the…
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: references/confluent-cloud.md, references/warpstream.md, references/build-templates.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvreferences/confluent-conventions.md:134Reads a .env file (negated — the text forbids it)- Never `cat .env`, `Read .env`, `head .env`, `grep .env`, or include `.env` in a `files: [...]` eval fixture.
negated
A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/confluent-cloud.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/warpstream.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/build-templates.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 86): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/confluent-cloud.md, references/warpstream.md, references/build-templates.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 85Steps. 35 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3132 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 834: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 5)
- +3All 4 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.