BD hinge-profile-optimizer
Comprehensive, research-backed Hinge dating profile optimization. Audits an existing profile, runs a discovery interview, writes prompts and captions, orders photos strategically, and gives post-launch algorithm strategy. Grounded in peer-reviewed behavioral research (Toma, Donath, Bruch & Newman) and signaling theory, not vibes. Activate on 'hinge profile', 'dating profile help', 'why am I not getting matches', 'dating app photo order'. NOT for a quick one-line prompt fix (full process runs ~45 min), other dating apps without adaptation, or general dating coaching outside profile scope.
Comprehensive, research-backed Hinge dating profile optimization.
As a process D 40/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/audit-criteria.md, references/discovery-questions.md, references/photo-guidelines.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/audit-criteria.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/discovery-questions.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/photo-guidelines.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/hinge-prompts-current.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/copy-principles.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/research-findings.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/hinge-settings.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: references/audit-criteria.md, references/discovery-questions.md, references/photo-guidelines.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4214 tokens
- 85Steps. 110 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 594: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 110 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.