SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB llm-streaming-response-handler

Build production LLM streaming UIs with Server-Sent Events, real-time token display, cancellation, error recovery. Handles OpenAI/Anthropic/Claude streaming APIs. Use for chatbots, AI assistants, real-time text generation. Activate on "LLM streaming", "SSE", "token stream", "chat UI", "real-time AI". NOT for batch processing, non-streaming APIs, or WebSocket bidirectional chat.

curiositech/some_claude_skills Agent Skills author: curiositech 7 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 3 160 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 39 min ago

Build production LLM streaming UIs with Server-Sent Events, real-time token display, cancellation, error recovery.

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, progress reporting

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
100/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
100
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 24 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3160 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • -223 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 380: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 21 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 100.