SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB logging-observability

Structured logging, distributed tracing, and metrics for production applications. [What: OpenTelemetry setup, log level strategy, correlation IDs, SLI/SLO alerting thresholds, Grafana dashboard design, PagerDuty integration] [When: setting up production logging, adding observability to a service, debugging distributed systems, designing alerting, implementing traces/metrics/logs] [Keywords: logging, observability, OpenTelemetry, OTel, structured logs, distributed tracing, correlation ID, metrics, Grafana, Prometheus, PagerDuty, Winston, Pino, structlog, log levels, SLI, SLO, alerting] NOT for application performance profiling (use a profiler), load testing, or database query optimization.

curiositech/some_claude_skills Claude Code author: curiositech 4 files body ≈ 2 839 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 39 min ago

Structured logging, distributed tracing, and metrics for production applications.

As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
95
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
70/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 6 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2839 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 697: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 15 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.