SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC sound-engineer

Expert in spatial audio, procedural sound design, game audio middleware, and app UX sound design. Specializes in HRTF/Ambisonics, Wwise/FMOD integration, UI sound design, and adaptive music systems. Activate on 'spatial audio', 'HRTF', 'binaural', 'Wwise', 'FMOD', 'procedural sound', 'footstep system', 'adaptive music', 'UI sounds', 'notification audio', 'sonic branding'. NOT for music composition/production (use DAW), audio post-production for film (linear media), voice cloning/TTS (use voice-audio-engineer), podcast editing (use standard audio editors), or hardware design.

curiositech/some_claude_skills Agent Skills author: curiositech 3 files body ≈ 2 640 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 39 min ago

Expert in spatial audio, procedural sound design, game audio middleware, and app UX sound design.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureDesignMedia and videoWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 71 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2640 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 581: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 28 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 71 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.