SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD show-me-your-work

Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human reviews after stepping away.

cursor/plugins Claude Code author: cursor 2 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 585 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/harness/claude-code.md, references/decision-log-template.tsv

AnalyzerSoftware developmentAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/harness/claude-code.md, references/decision-log-template.tsv
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: show-me-your-work (cursor/plugins)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/harness/claude-code.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/decision-log-template.tsv
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 26): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/harness/claude-code.md, references/decision-log-template.tsv
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../../docs/harness/claude-code.md, references/decision-log-template.tsv
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1585 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 322: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.