SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC DetectAI

Detects AI-generated writing: heuristic audit against known AI patterns, statistical signals (entropy, burstiness), an empirical Pangram score, and a keyless scan for watermark or steganography signatures (invisible characters, homoglyphs, bidi). USE WHEN detect AI writing, is this AI, AI detection, AI detector, did an AI write this, does this sound like AI, pangram, scan for AI tells, AI-isms, burstiness, is this watermarked. NOT FOR rewriting prose (a writing skill), plagiarism, judging quality.

danielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure Agent Skills author: danielmiessler MIT 5 files body ≈ 895 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 75 min ago

Detects AI-generated writing: heuristic audit against known AI patterns, statistical signals (entropy, burstiness), an empirical Pangram score, and a keyless…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 12, column 14: description: Detects AI-generated writing: heuristic audit against known AI pat… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
    • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "evals"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 895 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 502: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.