SKILLEMALL.ai

BD ReadIt

Reads content aloud in the DA's Fish Audio voice (an article, a file, pasted text, or what the DA just wrote) as one continuous read that starts within seconds and can be paused or stopped. USE WHEN read it to me, read this to me, read that aloud, read it, ri, /ri, play this, say this out loud, listen to this, read the article, read your write-up, stop reading, pause the read, resume the read. NOT FOR spoken tutorials (Teach), narrated video essays (the video-essay skill), one-line status notifications (the voice endpoint), or the phone and text lines.

The skillemall take

Reads text aloud using Fish Audio voice—articles, files, pasted content, or what you just wrote. Starts within seconds, pause and resume work. Triggers on commands like 'read this', 'play this', /ri, and similar.

Grade B, quality score 82—files intact, no broken links, no critical issues. One script, minimal logic. In practice: installable, but don't expect seamless integration. Fish Audio voice works, pause-resume function is there. The catch: process score sits at 47, suggesting the instruction set is thin or commands respond slowly. Good for quick article playback; less ideal if you need snappy sync with long texts.

danielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure Agent Skills author: danielmiessler 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 101 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 28 h ago

Reads content aloud in the DA's Fish Audio voice (an article, a file, pasted text, or what the DA just wrote) as one continuous read that starts within…

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "evals"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 14 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1101 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 558: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.