SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD android-cicd

Automated Android CI/CD pipeline to Google Play — supports TWA, React Native, Flutter, and native Android. Run npx android-cicd to set up keystore generation, GitHub Secrets, and a multi-stage workflow (internal/alpha/beta/production) with auto-bump versionCode.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 066 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Automated Android CI/CD pipeline to Google Play — supports TWA, React Native, Flutter, and native Android.

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: templates/gradle/signing.gradle

ProcedureGitHubGoogle CloudInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: templates/gradle/signing.gradle
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Risky intent medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The purpose itself is risky: wallets, browser password stores, offensive security. Even an honest implementation gives the agent access to things that cost money.

For the author

Explain in the description why the access is needed and how it is limited; add tests that show refusals on dangerous requests.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Risky intent intent-wallet-secrets SKILL.md:120
    Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target
    | `KEYSTORE_PASSWORD` | Keystore password |

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/gradle/signing.gradle
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "risk"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "date_added"

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: templates/gradle/signing.gradle
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: templates/gradle/signing.gradle
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 24 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 30 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2066 tokens
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 262: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.