SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD best-practices

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 926 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality.

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../web-quality-audit/SKILL.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmentSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../web-quality-audit/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 2 more places: RA-Skills, gsd-2

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../web-quality-audit/SKILL.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 72, 237, 257, 545): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../web-quality-audit/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../web-quality-audit/SKILL.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 22 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2926 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 223: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 41 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
  • +4Has examples (30 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.