SKILLEMALL.ai

CC devops-iac-engineer

Implements infrastructure as code using Terraform, Kubernetes, and cloud platforms. Designs scalable architectures, CI/CD pipelines, and observability solutions. Provides security-first DevOps practices and site reliability engineering guidance.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 14 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 568 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Implements infrastructure as code using Terraform, Kubernetes, and cloud platforms.

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureKubernetesTerraformAWSInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 5

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 5
  • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal reference/kubernetes.md:332
    Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)
    db-password: cGFz…MjM=  # base64 encoded
  • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal reference/kubernetes.md:343
    Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (placeholder value)
    db-password: AgBq…...  # Encrypted with controller's public key
    placeholder
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security reference/security.md:650
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - [ ] **Regular security reviews** - Penetration testing, audits
  • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal reference/terraform.md:387
    Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)
    password = "Supe…123!"  # Never do this!
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:79
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
    - Security scanning and penetration testing
    detector

Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 85Steps. 68 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1568 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 245: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.