SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC playwright-e2e-builder

Plan and build comprehensive Playwright E2E test suites with Page Object Model, authentication state persistence, custom fixtures, visual regression, and CI integration. Uses interview-driven planning to clarify critical user flows, auth strategy, test data approach, and parallelization before writing any tests.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 1 file body ≈ 5 150 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Plan and build comprehensive Playwright E2E test suites with Page Object Model, authentication state persistence, custom fixtures, visual regression, and CI…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

GeneratorPlaywrightGitHubDockerData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5150 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5150 tokens
  • 85Steps. 35 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 313: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +4Has examples (18 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.