BD web-quality-audit
Comprehensive web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
Comprehensive web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices.
As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../performance/SKILL.md, ../core-web-vitals/SKILL.md, ../accessibility/SKILL.md
The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../performance/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../core-web-vitals/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../accessibility/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../seo/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../best-practices/SKILL.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 88): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: ../performance/SKILL.md, ../core-web-vitals/SKILL.md, ../accessibility/SKILL.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 71 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1572 tokens
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 222: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 71 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.