SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC doordash-allergy-shield

Persistent dietary safety layer for DoorDash CLI (dd-cli) ordering. Stores a personal/household dietary profile (allergens with severity tiers, diets, dislikes) that every cart is vetted against before checkout, with a deterministic tripwire — the vetting step saves the full cart contents to a vetted-cart dump, and a PreToolUse hook re-greps that dump against the anaphylaxis-severity allergen list before any checkout URL is allowed. Use when the user mentions allergies or dietary restrictions, when ordering food for someone with restrictions, or on every dd-cli cart flow while this skill is installed. A tripwire, not medical-grade — the human checkout page is the final check.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 2 files body ≈ 1 107 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Persistent dietary safety layer for DoorDash CLI (dd-cli) ordering.

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 17 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1107 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 684: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.