SKILLEMALL.ai

BC doordash-order-ledger

Accountability layer for agent-driven DoorDash ordering. Works with the doordash-audit-log hook (which appends every dd-cli invocation to an append-only audit log) and the /doordash-report command to answer "what has my AI been ordering and what did it cost" from data instead of memory. Use when the user asks about their DoorDash spending, ordering patterns, what the agent did in past sessions, or wants jq recipes for querying the audit log. Covers log schema, query patterns, rotation, and privacy guidance.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 1 file body ≈ 730 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Accountability layer for agent-driven DoorDash ordering.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 6 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 730 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 512: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.