SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD Data Privacy Compliance

Data privacy and regulatory compliance specialist for GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and international data protection laws. Use when implementing privacy controls, conducting data protection impact assessments, ensuring regulatory compliance, or managing data subject rights. Expert in consent management, data minimization, and privacy-by-design principles.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 1 file body ≈ 4 252 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Data privacy and regulatory compliance specialist for GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and international data protection laws.

As a process D 42/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerLegalSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
42/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)

    Process rating: all ten parameters 42/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Data Privacy Compliance) differs from the folder (data-privacy-compliance)
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4252 tokens
    • 85Steps. 68 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 347: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 26 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
    • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.