SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC information-security-manager-iso27001

Senior Information Security Manager specializing in ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 implementation for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides ISMS implementation, cybersecurity risk assessment, security controls management, and compliance oversight. Use for ISMS design, security risk assessments, control implementation, and ISO 27001 certification activities.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 806 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Senior Information Security Manager specializing in ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 implementation for HealthTech and MedTech companies.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSecurityData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:110
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:193
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - **Technical Security Testing**: Vulnerability assessments and penetration testing

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 92 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2806 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 357: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 25 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 92 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.