CC isms-audit-expert
Senior ISMS Audit Expert for internal and external information security management system auditing. Provides ISO 27001 audit expertise, security audit program management, security control assessment, and compliance verification. Use for ISMS internal auditing, external audit preparation, security control testing, and ISO 27001 certification support.
Senior ISMS Audit Expert for internal and external information security management system auditing.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:57Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing coordination
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:59Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Threat simulation and red team exercises
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:128Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)2. **Penetration Testing Coordination**
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:129Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **For External Networks**: Follow references/external-pentest-guide.md
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:130Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **For Internal Systems**: Follow references/internal-pentest-guide.md
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 105 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3015 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 351: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 23 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 105 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.