SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD PocketBase SDK

JavaScript SDK usage for PocketBase client applications. Use when calling PocketBase from frontend or Node.js, authenticating users, subscribing to realtime events, uploading files, or working with the PocketBase JS/TS SDK. Covers CRUD, auth flows, authStore, realtime SSE, file handling, batch operations, and query syntax.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 574 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

JavaScript SDK usage for PocketBase client applications.

As a process D 36/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

IntegrationSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
36/100
Unfinished process
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 202): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100

    • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (PocketBase SDK) differs from the folder (pb-sdk)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2574 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 324: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 39 headings
    • +4Has examples (33 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.