SKILLEMALL.ai

CC avoid-ai-writing

Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms"). Use this skill when asked to "remove AI-isms," "clean up AI writing," "edit writing for AI patterns," "audit writing for AI tells," or "make this sound less like AI." Supports a detect-only mode, an edit-in-place mode for files, an optional voice profile (casual / professional / technical / warm / blunt), and an iterate-to-convergence pass.

davila7/claude-code-templates Agent Skills author: davila7 MIT 2 files body ≈ 22 231 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: url

AnalyzerWriting and documentsQuality controlAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: url
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Execution cost w 6
10
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 22231 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: url
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "repo"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 522): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: url
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: url
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 22231 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 85Steps. 235 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 411: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 88 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 235 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.