SKILLEMALL.ai

AC stepfun-tts

Generate Chinese / Japanese speech with StepFun's Contextual TTS — default `stepaudio-2.5-tts` (blind-judged better on neutral/emotive preset voices), `stepaudio-3-tts` for whisper & inline-prosody cases (where it won the same blind test). Replaces step-tts-2's `voice_label` with natural-language `instruction` (200 chars on 2.5, 500 on v3) plus inline `()` parentheses for句内 prosody. Use when the user wants emotional / prosody control over voice synthesis (whisper, pause, stress, mood pivot mid-sentence), batch-generates game / app voice lines, migrates from `step-tts-2` or `stepaudio-2.5-tts` (the `voice_label → instruction` breaking change), or needs cloned voices (复刻音色:克隆合成禁用 v3——克隆丢失,走 stepaudio-2.5-tts/step-tts-2). Triggers on 阶跃 TTS, StepAudio 合成, stepaudio-3-tts, stepaudio-2.5-tts, 语音合成, 配音, 文本转语音, TTS 升级, 迁移 step-tts-2. For transcription with the sibling stepaudio-3-asr-max model, use the stepfun-asr skill instead.

daymade/claude-code-skills Agent Skills author: daymade 6 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 188 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 h ago

Generate Chinese / Japanese speech with StepFun's Contextual TTS — default stepaudio-2.5-tts (blind-judged better on neutral/emotive preset voices)…

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorSoftware developmentAI and agentsMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 85Steps. 18 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2188 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 935: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.