SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC stepfun-tts

Generates Chinese/Japanese speech with StepFun's Contextual TTS — default stepaudio-2.5-tts, stepaudio-3-tts for whisper/inline-() prosody. Replaces step-tts-2's voice_label with natural-language instruction. Use for emotional/prosody-controlled synthesis, batch voice lines, migrating from step-tts-2, or cloned voices (2.5/step-tts-2, not v3). Triggers on 阶跃 TTS, 语音合成, 配音. Not for transcription (use stepfun-asr).

daymade/claude-code-skills Claude Code author: daymade MIT 6 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 2 325 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 11 d ago

Generates Chinese/Japanese speech with StepFun's Contextual TTS — default stepaudio-2.5-tts, stepaudio-3-tts for whisper/inline-() prosody. Replaces…

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorSoftware developmentAI and agentsMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
95
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 85Steps. 19 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2325 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 416: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.