CC claude-migrate-memory-to-doc
Migrates Claude Code personal memory (the per-project memory/ directory) into tool-agnostic reference docs so other AI CLIs that auto-load AGENTS.md (Codex primarily) can read the same user profile and preferences. Use when the user says "migrate my memory", "my memory is locked to Claude Code", "make Codex/Cursor read my profile", or reports memory has grown bloated with content that should be shared across tools. Also use it to retire a project's auto memory entirely (turn it off, move everything into documents, archive the directory).
Migrates Claude Code personal memory (the per-project memory/ directory) into tool-agnostic reference docs so other AI CLIs that auto-load AGENTS.md (Codex…
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The skill tells the agent to hide things from you: not to show errors, not to mention actions, to report differently from what was done. You lose the ability to see what the agent really did.
Transparency beats a smooth answer. If the goal is to hide technical noise, ask the agent to "summarise briefly", not to "not mention".
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
-
high Concealment
en-hide-from-userreferences/review_and_verification.md:79Instruction to hide actions from the userThis is empirical proof, captured in seconds, that beats any amount of "it should work". Do this yourself — never tell the user "you can check the log next time".
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 14 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3978 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 543: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.