SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC marketplace-dev

Builds and maintains Claude Code plugin marketplaces: converts a skills repo to spec-valid marketplace.json, adds/updates plugin entries, and migrates skills into or between suites. Use for marketplace.json, plugin distribution, one-click install, or "put these skills in a suite". Not for repo health audits (use marketplace-health-check) or cache reconciliation (use skill-governance).

daymade/claude-code-skills Claude Code author: daymade MIT 10 files · 5 scripts body ≈ 4 946 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 11 d ago

Builds and maintains Claude Code plugin marketplaces: converts a skills repo to spec-valid marketplace.json, adds/updates plugin entries, and migrates skills…

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: demo.gif

GeneratorGitHubCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: demo.gif
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: demo.gif

Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: demo.gif
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: demo.gif
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 17 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4946 tokens
  • 85Steps. 76 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 387: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 31 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 76 items
  • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.