SKILLEMALL.ai

AC macos-cleaner

Diagnoses and safely reclaims macOS disk space. Use when a Mac is low on storage, reports “Caching needs more space,” shows large Apple Content Caching or AssetCacheManagerUtil usage, or needs analysis of caches, logs, application remnants, large or duplicate files, Docker or OrbStack, Chromium code-sign clones, Homebrew, npm, pip, Xcode, and other developer storage. Routes known suspects to targeted read-only diagnosis before broad scans, distinguishes nominal path accounting from physical release, requires an impact-and-recovery plan plus explicit confirmation before state changes, and verifies disk space and co-resident services afterward.

daymade/claude-code-skills Agent Skills author: daymade 18 files body ≈ 4 859 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 h ago

Diagnoses and safely reclaims macOS disk space.

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerDockerInfrastructureData and analyticsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 29, 159, 206): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4859 tokens
    • 100Steps. 52 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 650: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
    • +3All 7 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.