AB frontend-visual-qa
Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find typography, wrapping, overlap, overflow, responsive, route, overlay, map, transient-state, data-visualization, browser-output, file-dialog, PDF/print, or Electron-shell defects, or to compare a rendered artifact with a visual reference. Do not use for greenfield UI design, extracting a design system from screenshots, general QA-program setup, or nonvisual code debugging.
Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or…
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 7316 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 7316 tokens
- 100Steps. 73 steps
- 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (11 tags): a typed call is more reliable
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 684: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 73 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.