AC marketplace-health-check
Run a full 6-dimension health check of this Claude Code skills marketplace repo — code/script safety, documentation/SSOT consistency, security/PII leaks, open-PR triage, open-issue triage, and marketplace-manifest integrity — via a parallel fan-out Dynamic Workflow, then verify the serious findings and report them by priority. Use this whenever the user asks to check the repo, run a health check, do a full sweep/audit before a release, 全面体检, 检查仓库状态, 看看仓库健康吗, 审计一下仓库, or asks whether the PRs / issues / docs / versions / PII are in good shape across the board — even if they never say the word "workflow". Reach for it for any broad "is this whole repo OK" request, not just one-file checks.
Run a full 6-dimension health check of this Claude Code skills marketplace repo — code/script safety, documentation/SSOT consistency, security/PII leaks…
As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1905 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 694: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.