SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB twitter-reader

Fetch Twitter/X post content including long-form Articles with full images and metadata. Use when Claude needs to retrieve tweet/article content, author info, engagement metrics, and embedded media. Supports individual posts and X Articles (long-form content). Automatically downloads all images to local attachments folder and generates complete Markdown with proper image references. Preferred over Jina for X Articles with images.

daymade/claude-code-skills Agent Skills author: daymade 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 848 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Fetch Twitter/X post content including long-form Articles with full images and metadata.

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting

IntegrationWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 165): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 28 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1848 tokens
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 433: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 22 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.