SKILLEMALL.ai

AB windows-remote-desktop-connection-doctor

Diagnose Windows App (Microsoft Remote Desktop / Azure Virtual Desktop / W365 / direct PC) connection issues on macOS. Analyze transport protocol selection (UDP Shortpath vs WebSocket), detect VPN/proxy interference, parse Windows App logs for Shortpath failures, and resolve stuck "Configuring remote PC..." dialogs caused by expired Microsoft accounts, server reboots, or client-side auth poisoning. Use when VDI connections are slow or stuck, when direct PC connections fail to connect, when transport shows WebSocket instead of UDP, when RDP Shortpath fails, or when Windows App is frozen at a progress dialog.

daymade/claude-code-skills Agent Skills author: daymade 5 files body ≈ 3 838 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 h ago

Diagnose Windows App (Microsoft Remote Desktop / Azure Virtual Desktop / W365 / direct PC) connection issues on macOS.

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAzureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
      Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
      allowed-tools: Read Grep Bash

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 40 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3838 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 614: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 23 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.