SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC pol-probe-advisor

Select the right Proof of Life (PoL) probe based on hypothesis, risk, and resources. Use this to match the validation method to the real learning goal, not tooling comfort.

deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills Claude Code author: deanpeters NOASSERTION 1 file body ≈ 4 983 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 4 d ago

Select the right Proof of Life (PoL) probe based on hypothesis, risk, and resources.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md, ../pol-probe/SKILL.md, ../problem-statement/SKILL.md

AnalyzerAirtableFigmaPowerPointSoftware developmentResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md, ../pol-probe/SKILL.md, ../problem-statement/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Result and completion w 14
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../pol-probe/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../problem-statement/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../problem-framing-canvas/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../discovery-process/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../epic-hypothesis/SKILL.md
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "intent"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "best_for"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "scenarios"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "theme"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "estimated_time"

Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md, ../pol-probe/SKILL.md, ../problem-statement/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: ../workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md, ../pol-probe/SKILL.md, ../problem-statement/SKILL.md
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4983 tokens
  • 85Steps. 148 steps, 3 vague phrases
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 172: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 34 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 148 items
  • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.