SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC building-pydantic-ai-agents

Build AI agents with Pydantic AI — tools, capabilities, structured output, streaming, testing, and multi-agent patterns. Use when the user mentions Pydantic AI, imports pydantic_ai, or asks to build an AI agent, add tools/capabilities, stream output, define agents from YAML, or test agent behavior.

docling-project/docling Agent Skills author: docling-project MIT 11 files body ≈ 2 672 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Build AI agents with Pydantic AI — tools, capabilities, structured output, streaming, testing, and multi-agent patterns.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: docling

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 18 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2672 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 299: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.