SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD audit-decisions

Audit the decisions an implementing agent made, not its diff — a pure audit that traces the session's history into a decisions ledger, changes no code, and never blocks an unsupervised run. Working code still embeds architecture the user never chose; surface it because future work inherits it. Use when the user wants to review the decisions the AI made on their behalf, before merging or committing AI-implemented work, when integrating a delegated subagent's pass, or when a fix "works" but might be a point fix.

dzhng/jevgrep Agent Skills author: dzhng 1 file body ≈ 2 402 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 12 h ago

Audit the decisions an implementing agent made, not its diff — a pure audit that traces the session's history into a decisions ledger, changes no code, and…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../eli5/SKILL.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../eli5/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../eli5/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../eli5/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../eli5/SKILL.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2402 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 515: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.